Still debating whether or not to blog? This piece in Education Week (free registration required) shows some of the benefits and drawbacks when principals and superintendents blog. Case studies include people in Tucson, Oklahoma City, Indiana, and western New York State, including how they handled comments.
Research to practice: bridging the gap
April 8, 2007A continuing challenge for any research organization is to strengthen the ties between research and practice.
In a 2006 article in the Journal for Research in Mathematics Education*, the NCTM Research Committee proposes that the need for improvement is two-way. The practice of classroom teaching needs to be better informed by an understanding of research, and researchers need to learn more from the insights and knowledge of teachers.
Efforts to make teaching more research-based are slowed by two challenges, the authors say:
1. translating research results into practical advice that can be implemented in today’s classrooms, and
2. targeting research to questions that are important to teachers.
Some journals aim at researchers; others aim at teachers. But in the case of mathematics education, at least, no journal focuses on providing syntheses of direct responses to teacher-generated questions of general importance. So teachers have no direct resource for research-based responses to their immediate questions.
In addition, many classroom teachers have little time for, or experience in, reading and interpreting research, and then translating those findings into practice. Teachers’ day-to-day priorities are often determined externally and politically, and their day-to-day priorities don’t always coincide with the long-term programmatic interests of the professional researcher.
And the knowledge, experience, and wisdom of classroom teachers are often untapped in research projects that could benefit from that perspective. The result is a bi-directional disconnect.
The article proposes that teachers and researchers collaborate in two ways:
1. develop researchable, generalizeable, and useable research questions.
2. communicate the research results in teacher-friendly ways.
The person best able to broker communication would be a practitioner with a working knowledge of both research and teaching, for example ‘instructional engineers’ or teacher leaders, who take the theory and results of research and design practical ways for them to inform classroom teaching.
Teacher-leaders may be teacher educators, professional developers, a school district’s content area supervisors, school department heads, or classroom teachers—anyone with the experience and knowledge needed to put research results into operation.
The authors encourage researchers to seek out more practitioners whom they can engage in collaborative and meaningful research on questions of mutual interest. Meanwhile, researchers need more support in their efforts to conduct school-based research. They often face regulations and funding priorities that restrict or discourage research in schools.
* Source: “The Challenge of Linking Research and Practice.” NCTM Research Committee. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2006, Vol. 37 No. 2
Evaluating changes in knowledge and behavior
March 22, 2007Communicators often measure what we do, but too often measurement is limited to outputs. What really counts is the degree to which our communications really change the way people think and behave. So how to combine the use of new communication tools like blogs, wikis, and mash-ups with traditional research methods? Here’s a brief case study written by Glenn O’Neil, Benchpoint Ltd. and International University in Geneva, Switzerland. O’Neil measured the degree of change in the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of people who attended the LIFT06 conference.
Measures of behavior change included actions undertaken, initiatives launched, and contacts made, as a result of attending the conference. O’Neil used qualitative and quantitative methods to construct an evaluation framework, and drew from methods developed in the fields of public relations and adult learning. Data sources included content analysis of blog posts and a conference program wiki, and a participant survey.
Top posts for past 30 days
February 19, 2007Top posts for the past 30 days
How Computer Games Help Children Learn
NSPRA: Set blogging guidelines!
Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice
Interactive campaigns and press releases
Time for a communications audit?
Assessing organizational communication
Six trends in PR
Monitoring your web presence
PR education must address technology
January 4, 2007The contemporary practice of public relations requires practitioners to immediately respond to emerging issues and crises via Web sites, blogs, and other new media. Students of public relations consequently must know how to use today’s communications technology, monitor it, and (most likely) adopt rapidly and unpredictably changing technology, says the report “The Professional Bond: Public Relations Education for the 21st Century,” published by the Commission on Public Relations Education.
Students must learn strategies, not only for using this technology, but also for dealing with its effects, ranging from the ready availability of virtually all types of information to questions of personal and organizational privacy, the report says.
In addition to the chapter on communication technology, the report addresses ethics, diversity, global implications, supervised experience, distance learning, governance and academic support, faculty credentials, professional and pre-professional organizations, and professional certification and accreditation.
The technology chapter presents recommendations for PR undergraduate and graduate education, and encourages the linking of PR education and practice that is typical in most other professions.
Educators and practitioners contacted during this study viewed as “highly essential” course content such as “New PR tools and technologies,” e.g., podcasting, blogging, and video blogging, RSS feeds, Internet conferencing, e-networking, and interactive media kits.
Students should be aware how PR practices can benefit from use of these tools, the report says; but, at the same time, educators should lead classroom discussions that explore any adverse impact of technology on society and should challenge students to critically think about use of new technologies to reach PR goals and objectives.
(Hat tip to the Institute for Public Relations)
Uncategorized | Tagged:
Posted by paul baker