Measuring media with del.icio.us

April 28, 2008

Careaga

The communications staff at Missouri University of Science and Technology use a del.icio.us account to track their online news stories and blog posts. Like EducationPR, they use Google Alerts and Technorati to find the stories in the first place. They they select the ones they think are the most important or most closely tied to key messages to post on del.icio.us.

Andrew Careaga at Higher Ed Marketing says using del.icio.us “… makes it easier for us to keep track of media coverage, but we’ve also discovered a side benefit: del.icio.us gives us yet another tool for measuring and analyzing our media relations activities in the sphere of online social media.”


IPR offers research portal

March 21, 2008

IPR

The Institute for Public Relations’ new Essential Knowledge Project provides a portal to research-based knowledge that’s critical to the maturation of public relations as a strategic management function and a profession.

The online guide, under development, points to research into how organizations build and manage relationships with customers, communities, employees and other stakeholders.

Three topics are available so far: “Trust and PR Practice” by Brad L. Rawlins, associate department chair, Brigham Young University; “Ethics and Public Relations” by Shannon A. Bowen, assistant professor, University of Maryland; and “Crisis Management and Communications” by W. Timothy Coombs, associate professor, Eastern Illinois University.

Other topics under development include employee communications, investor relations, corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and branding, and measurement and evaluation of public relations.

The Institute for Public Relations is an independent nonprofit that seeks to bridge the academy and the profession and to support PR research and PR education.


More communications sessions at AERA

February 13, 2008

aera

Educators with particular interests in communication, outreach, and dissemination will have plenty of opportunities to participate in discussions at AERA next month. I’ve mentioned one related session I’ll be involved in March 26. On March 27 I’ll moderate a panel on behalf of the Outreach and Communications committee: ‘Disseminating Education Research through Electronic Media: Advice from E-Journalists.’ Panelists will include Alexander Russo, This Week In Education; Andrew Rotherham, EduWonk; Jennifer Medina, New York Times; and Richard Colvin, Hechinger Institute, Columbia University.

Here are two three more that look promising:
A Presidential Session titled ‘Making a Difference in Policy & Practice: Communication, Education Research, and Civic Responsibility,’ set for Tuesday, March 25, at 4:05 p.m. Speakers include Susan Fuhrman, Teachers College, Columbia University; Alex Molnar, Arizona State University; and Diane Ravitch, New York University. The session aims to generate dialog about the obstacles and pathways in the communication process between researchers, policymakers, practitioners and relevant publics.

Another session, ‘The Media and Higher Education: Toward Better Communication,’ will feature Scott Jaschik, InsideHigherEd; Steve Drummond, National Public Radio; MaryBeth Marklein, USA Today; and Jeff Selingo, Chronicle of Higher Education. Tuesday, March 25, 2:15 p.m.

And another:
Communicating Educational Research: Issues and Examples
Wed, Mar 26 – 8:15am – 10:15am
Chair: Robert V. Labaree. Papers include:
“Connecting Educational Research With an Audience” by Gary Natriello;
“Evaluating the Effectiveness of Data Displays in Education Journals,” by Luke Duesbery and Jan McCoy;
“Examining Levers for Change: Southeastern State Initiatives to Improve High Schools,” by Julie Edmunds; and
“Web Video As a Public Sphere for Educational Researchers,” by Brian Hughes.


Communicators using more social media

December 6, 2007

Getting coverage in traditional media ranks near the bottom of the list for 300 communicators responding to a recent survey sponsored by the Society for New Communications Research (SNCR), according to a December 6 release.

Fifty-seven percent of 300 respondents in a recent SNCR survey said that social media tools are becoming more valuable to their activities as more customers and influencers use them. Twenty-seven percent of respondents reported that social media is a core element of their communications strategy. Only 3 percent stated that social media have little or no value to their communications initiatives. Respondents believe that social media is most effective for the following sectors: arts, entertainment and recreation; communications; computer hardware; and education.

These are among the initial findings of a study, “New Media, New Influencers and Implications for the PR Profession,” presented at the Society for New Communications Research Symposium in Boston.

Nearly 300 public relations, corporate and marketing communications professionals experienced in social media participated in the survey, which focused on how influence patterns are changing and how communications professionals address those changes.

According to the SNCR release, survey respondents said the most effective tools for their social media initiatives are blogs, online video, and social networks. The top three criteria for determining the relevance and potential influence of a blogger or podcaster are quality of content on the blog or podcast, relevance of content to the company or brand, and search engine rankings.

According to SNCR, fifty-one percent of respondents formally measure the effects of their social media initiatives. The metrics they value most are enhancement of relationships with key audiences, enhancement of reputation, customer awareness of program, and comments and posts relevant to the organization or products. Close to the bottom of the list was traditional media coverage.

SNCR reports that detailed study results will be published in the upcoming issue of the Journal of New Communications Research.


A quiz for students of PR

November 14, 2007

Dear students of public relations:
Maybe you can help me out.
I received an email today that began like this:

Princeton, N.J. (November 13, 2007) -Educational Testing Service (ETS) and Certiport today announced an agreement to create a solution leveraging their assessment and certification programs around digital literacy and critical thinking with regard to information and communications technologies (ICTs).

Can you help me with this?
When someone ‘announces an agreement,’ is that a big deal?
What does it mean to ‘create a solution’?
What does it mean to ‘leverage programs around’ something?
Are the the programs ‘with regard to’. . . or are digital literacy and critical thinking ‘with regard to’ . . . ?

And, finally, why did they send this message to me?
If you have some clues, please let me know.

Sincerely,
Paul


Informing the Public Agenda

November 8, 2007

louisville

The Association for the Study of Higher Education is meeting in Louisville this week. The theme for this year’s conference is “Informing the public agenda for higher education: The role and relevance of research.” With my friends Dan Laitch and Michelle Nilson of Simon Fraser University I’ll participate today in a roundtable discussion about communicating to policymakers, writing for specific audiences, and using social media as part of a communication mix. Too bad we’re presenting at the same time another roundtable discusses “the transformative potential of blogs for the higher education research profession.” I’d like to attend that one; I’ll ask Jana Bouwma-Gearhart for her notes.


A challenge to professional comm organizations

October 29, 2007

“I’m quite happy to keep forking out my association memberships if I can see that at the very least those associations are furthering understanding of the profession and setting and maintaining sufficiently high standards so the public doesn’t get ripped off and that when I go to a party I don’t get called a spin doctor or – worse – ‘perpetrator of the black arts’. Because that’s not what I do,” writes Catherine Arrow in PR Conversations.

In the post “Where Next for Professional Organizations” she writes, “As a member, I want to see those assocations visible and working everywhere – not just in mainstream, but in Facebook too, or where I can Stumbleupon them by chance as I link in to another group. I don’t want to have to wait six months to find out how much a conference is going to cost me next June nor do I want an old-school hard copy magazine with information that is weeks out of date, when in my network I can have accurate, albeit competing information to hand in seconds.”

“Like everyone else,” she continues, “professional associations must surely realise that their business model has changed and that they must work out how to fit/create/devise their new one – fast. I just hope that in our sector, the associations will use the kind of swift response mechanisms most practitioners are used to using in order to facilitate change.Otherwise, why should I click the ‘renew’ button next time around?”

(via Tough Sledding)


How tech is changing PR

October 29, 2007

Kirk Hallahan is a former PR practitioner and now a professor at Colorado State University. In an insightful article for the Institute for Public Relations he summarizes his thoughts on the interaction between public relations and new communications technology. Here are some excerpts:

1. Public relations activities cannot be segregated from an organization’s other uses of technology. Communications technologies have altered PR’s structure and function. Customers and others are increasingly asked to interact with organizations through web- and wireless-based self-service technologies. As a result, technology-driven public relations activities are increasingly indistinguishable from routine organizational activities.

2. Public relations must redefine itself as a result of technology. The rise of new communications technologies makes even more irrelevant the traditional distinctions between communications activities. The critical question is whether practitioners are charged merely with producing, distributing and promoting messages that take advantage of new technologies (the traditional communication function of public relations); or should the real function of public relations be to advise managements at all levels (from chief executives to systems analysts) about maximizing organizational-user relationships regardless of who produces content?

3. New technologies are not the solution to all organizational communications problems. Organizations might be tempted to adopt every new medium that becomes available. But they must invest in new media selectively and strategically. New communications technologies must be combined into an integrated media mix that also takes full advantage of traditional media. The metrics for measuring many of the newest media are only in the developmental stage. More needs to be learned about new media’s impact on organizational relationships and reputation.

4. Technology poses new challenges to public relations and client organizations. New technologies can be incorporated into any of the four basic types of public relations programs involving promotion, relationship building and maintenance, crisis communications or issues management. The speed with which information can be shared with stakeholders during a crisis or controversy is obviously an ideal application of new media. Yet speed has placed new, unintended burdens on organizations as well. New media present new sources of crises that did not exist previously. These range from unfounded online rumors to malicious attacks by critics who enjoy unfettered access to a global audience.

IPR


Public Relations = Google Relations

April 26, 2007

Maybe we should rename Public Relations “Google Relations.” Google’s search engine technology has changed the practice of public relations that much, says Greg Miller, President, Marketcom PR.

Every student of PR, and every practitioner, surely realizes that Google has upset the PR paradigm. As Miller points out, “every piece of public information about your company—the good, the bad, the ugly—lives on the Web more or less forever.”

Search engine technology makes every relevant piece of information available to anyone, at any time, as long as they have a computer and Internet access, Miller says.
Add-ons like Google Alert push information to the user instantly, and most of the content is not produced or controlled by the company named in the alert.

For PR and marketing professionals this means your audiences get information about your company as quickly as you do. It means that the media uses Google as a primary news source in its coverage about your organization. Blogs report, or distort, information about your organization in ways that are nearly impossible to prevent or, once posted, take down.

Miller recommends several things you can do, among them:
* Conduct an audit of how your organization is represented in the search engine database.
* Use the power of the new media. For example, post a video on YouTube. Consider a sponsored blog. Think about buying a Google Ad.

Thanks to The Daily Dog


Finding Time and Language to Communicate Your Research

April 16, 2007

We promised last week during our AERA communication presentation that we’d post Janet Angelis’s powerpoint and supporting materials. So here they are. This material can benefit any researcher willing to take the extra time necessary to translate the academic language of a professional paper into language more accessible to the media, to policymakers, and the general public.

Finding Time and Language to Communicate Your Research to the World (powerpoint)

Ten Tips for reaching a wider audience (.doc)

Transparency worksheet (.doc)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.